A few months ago, I decided to replace the faucet in my kitchen. To be clear, I did not want a project; the old one had just reached the point where water was sluggishly gurgling out and doing a lousy job of cleaning my dishes.
My plan was to call a plumber and be done with it. My wife had other plans. In slightly more colorful language, she told me to “man up” and do it myself; that YouTube was invented for people like me who need to replace their kitchen faucets. Okay. We’d save a few hundred dollars, and…how hard could it be?
Well, you probably have a good idea of where this story is headed…
A few hours into it, I was standing in my kitchen looking at a situation that had gotten noticeably worse. I made the executive decision to call the plumber. He fixed it without much drama, for more money than it would have cost if I’d just called him first, because now there was more to fix.
As for my wife, she stood by her advice, calling the result of my handywork a “consumer problem.”
The thing is, she wasn’t wrong that people replace their own kitchen faucets. Some of them do fine, but I’m one sorry excuse for a plumber (with or without the YouTube assistance). Her advice came without context on the type of faucet, the setup, or the baseline skill level the job ultimately required. The advice skipped straight to the conclusion, delivered from an always-overconfident type A alpha woman.
But the whole experience got me thinking about how advice works, how it travels, how it picks up credibility it hasn’t necessarily earned, and how we follow it because the source seemed trustworthy or the logic seemed sound at the time. The content marketing world has the exact same problem, just with worse stock photography.
Advice about content spreads faster than the evidence for it does. A tactic works for one brand in one moment, someone writes it up, it gets shared, it becomes a framework, it becomes a course, it becomes conventional wisdom, and by the time it reaches you, it has no context attached to it. Just instructions.
So I went looking for the casualties.
I reached out to marketers, strategists, founders, and agency owners and asked them to share the worst content advice they ever followed. Not war stories for the sake of venting, but real moments where credible-sounding guidance led them somewhere they hoped never to venture.
Here’s what they said…
#1: “Expand into new categories before you’ve dominated one.”
Lorenzo Mariani, SEO Specialist at Mediaboom, learned this lesson the hard way.
He was working on a travel site focused on Tuscany, and over time, it built strong authority in that area. The content covered the region in detail, and search engines responded to that consistency and focus. The site had a clear identity and a clear advantage.
Then the site’s stakeholders pushed him to expand.
From a business perspective, expanding into more destinations seemed like the logical next step. More locations meant more keywords, more content, and more potential traffic. So they started adding Rome, the Amalfi Coast, and other regions before Tuscany had been fully built out.
At first, nothing seemed dramatically off. But over time, the cracks started to show. Rankings became less stable, traffic began to decline, and when the November 2023 Google core update hit, the site lost even more ground. “Expanding across too many categories too early weakened the entire domain,” Lorenzo told me.
The shift pulled the site away from what had made it strong in the first place. Instead of being known for depth in one area, it became broader and less defined, which made it harder to compete.
That experience reshaped how he approaches content. Now, he builds out one topic completely before moving on. “I focus on one silo at a time and only expand once a topic is fully covered.”
You Might Also Like: How To Project Brand Authority as a New Player
#2: “Post for the algorithm first and the audience will follow.”
Max Shak, Founder and CEO of nerD AI, followed the LinkedIn playbook the way many people do when they’re trying to grow.
He paid attention to timing, leaned into trending formats, and used hashtags the way the platform encourages. On paper, everything looked like it was working. The posts reached people, engagement stayed consistent, and the metrics suggested progress.
“But it did not lead to meaningful conversations or real business opportunities,” he told me.
That same issue showed up for others as well.
Darcie Cameron, Marketing Director and Co-Founder of The Multi-Passionate Pathway, noticed that chasing trends slowly pulled her away from her core message. The content became harder to follow, and it was more difficult for people to understand what she stood for.
Elijah Fernandez, Co-Founder and CTO at Cerevity, saw the effect in a more sensitive environment. Working with executives and clinicians, he watched how quickly that kind of content could lose credibility. “It encourages inauthentic work that erodes trust with sensitive audiences,” he says.
Across all three, the turning point came when they finally realized the platform wasn’t the audience.
Once they shifted their focus back to writing for real people, things started to come together. They narrowed their topics, committed to a few core ideas, and began paying attention to the conversations that followed their content rather than the reach alone.
#3: “More content means more traffic.”
Shoaib Mughal, Founder of Marketix Digital, followed a strategy that shows up in almost every SEO playbook.
The idea was that increasing output and volume would capture more search traffic, ultimately leading to growth.
Traffic did increase, which made the approach feel validated at first. But when he looked at how that traffic behaved, the limitations came into focus. “It created a lot of low-intent visitors with minimal commercial impact,” he said.
The content was attracting attention, but not the right attention.
Joe Spisak, Founder and CEO of Fulfill.com, ran into a similar issue and pushed the same strategy even further. His team published 47 blog posts in four months, covering logistics tips, warehouse best practices, and supply chain trends, all aimed at high-level operators in ecommerce.
Those readers were dealing with specific operational challenges tied to cost, scale, and performance.
“A skincare company shipping 40,000 orders per month with a 3PL that kept missing SLA commitments,” Joe says. “A supplement brand getting crushed by Zone 8 shipping costs.”
General content didn’t match those realities. Over four months, that volume of content brought in 11 leads.
That’s when the approach changed.
Joe moved away from publishing at scale and focused on detailed case studies built around real client data and real numbers. The shift brought in a more relevant audience, and engagement started to reflect that. “One killer case study with real numbers will outperform 50 mediocre posts every single time. Your audience isn’t bored teenagers scrolling TikTok. They’re busy professionals who’ll read 2,000 words if it solves a $300,000 problem,” he told me.
Shoaib reached a similar place from a different direction. Each piece of content now maps to a specific stage in the buying journey, which gives every page a defined role.
In both cases, the shift came down to alignment. Less output, but each piece is connected directly to how people evaluate decisions.
#4: “Publish every day no matter what.”
Sahil Agrawal, Founder and Head of Marketing at Qubit Capital, followed one of the most common pieces of advice in content marketing.
He published every day for four months.
At first, the results seemed to justify the effort. Traffic increased slightly, which was enough to keep the system running. But once he looked closer at what they were producing, the tradeoff became clear.
Qubit Capital works with startup founders on fundraising, a space where the quality of information carries weight. The content they were publishing no longer reflected that.
“We were so focused on cadence that we published pieces with surface-level research just to hit the schedule,” Sahil told me.
That realization led to a reset.
He reduced the publishing schedule to two pieces per week and shifted the focus toward original, data-driven content pulled from Qubit’s own platform insights. The change felt uncertain at first, especially with the drop in output.
Traffic dipped early on, then doubled within three months.
“Readers can feel the emptiness,” he says.
In a category like fundraising, that lack of depth affects how people evaluate the credibility of what they’re reading.
You Might Also Like: How Often Should You Publish Content?
#5: “Keep it factual and let the keywords do the work.”
Silvia Lupone, Owner of Stingray Villa, followed the kind of advice that shows up in nearly every guide to writing property listings.
She focused on facts, included the right keywords, and structured the listing to align with standard SEO recommendations. The result checked the expected boxes, but it didn’t communicate much about the actual experience.
“My listing lacked personality and conveyed nothing about what is uniquely Stingray Villa,” Silvia says.
The listing could have described almost any property.
She changed the approach by bringing in guest stories, real experiences, and more direct communication through email and reviews. The content began to reflect what it actually feels like to stay there, making it easier for potential guests to connect with it and build confidence in their decision.
#6: “Any press is good press.”
Colton De Vos, Marketing Specialist at Resolute Technology Solutions, operated under an assumption that has been repeated in marketing for decades.
Exposure leads to growth, and any mention contributes to that.
For a while, negative mentions were left alone because they didn’t seem urgent. That changed when it started to affect how buyers made decisions.
Modern buyers research before they commit. They check reviews, search results, and third-party platforms, often forming opinions before ever speaking to a company.
“All coverage is good coverage left negative mentions unmanaged, harming buyer perception during their research,” Colton says.
That shift in behavior led to a change in approach.
They set up brand-monitoring alerts and began actively managing reviews across platforms such as Google, Bing, and Trustpilot. The focus shifted to staying present with how the brand appears across those channels.
The idea that all press is good press comes from a time when buyers had fewer ways to verify what they were seeing. That’s no longer the case, and the way companies respond has to reflect that.
Where the Advice Kept Going Wrong
A few similarities showed up across almost every response.
The first was volume. More content, more categories, more posting days, more keywords. The advice consistently pointed toward doing more of the thing, while ignoring whether the thing was working.
The second pattern was SEO thinking that quietly pushed the reader out of the room. Shoaib’s team built traffic without building customers. Silvia’s listing checked every box and communicated nothing. The content was technically correct and practically empty, optimized for a ranking signal rather than a person making a decision.
The third was a subtler version of the same instinct: defaulting to what was safe, replicable, and easy to defend. Max, Darcie, and Elijah all followed playbooks that produced engagement without trust. Colton operated under an old adage that stopped being true the moment buyers had more places to look. The common thread was that generic advice applied to a specific situation almost always fits poorly.
None of these practitioners was following advice from people trying to mislead them. The guidance came from blogs, playbooks, peers, and stakeholders who had seen it work for someone at some point. But by the time it arrived, the context had been removed. What was left was just the instruction. Which, as it turns out, is a pretty good way to end up standing in your kitchen wondering where all the water came from.
Time to Course Correct?
The irony here is that this very article is giving advice about content. Some of it might age badly, and a few of the practitioners quoted here may even look back on their current approach the way they look back on the one that landed them in this piece.
That’s not a reason to ignore any of it. It’s a reason to hold it loosely, stay close to what’s working for your specific audience in your specific moment, and remain skeptical of anything packaged as a universal rule.
Good advice has a shelf life and a context. Check both before you follow it into the kitchen.
If your content strategy has a few of these fingerprints on it, I can help with that. Contact me or book a call, and let’s get to work.
Latest posts
Chris Karl is a content strategist and writer who helps brands turn what they know into what people trust. He has led large editorial teams, developed investor campaigns supporting multi-million-dollar raises, and helped SaaS companies double revenue by aligning content with real search intent. His work has appeared in outlets including Screen Rant and Wealth of Geeks, with syndication on MSN.